Article Written By: dspblackrock
Financial markets are made up of a host of different investors. There are large institutions, such as fund managers, as well as companies, brokers and individual investors. Over the long-term, markets can do well but in the short term, prices fluctuate on the basis of fundamental news, market sentiment, expectations, and rumour and competitor activity. Sometimes the 'herd' mentality can set in. When the news about a particular stock is good, investors buy in. Even though the price keeps rising, buyers keep buying, as nobody is sure when the price has peaked. Similarly, when prices are falling, nervous investors sell in an attempt to cut their losses.There are statistical measures and yardsticks, such as price-earning ratios, which help determine the true value of a stock or bond, but as the boom and bust in Internet stocks has proven, rational measures are often ignored and sentiment can take over. Deciding when to invest in this environment can be a stressful task. If the market is doing well you may fear that you're buying when prices are too high. By contrast, when the market is falling, there is a reluctance to invest due to fears that it may fall further. So what should an investor do to avoid having to make these timing decisions? If you are an investor in mutual fund it means that you buy more units when the purchase price is low and fewer units when the purchase price is high. The trick to all this is to remember that it's not the price you pay for each unit that matters. It's the average price per unit over time that determines your overall return. Lets look at an example to make all this a bit clearer. Ajay has been investing Rs 5,000 per month in a particular equity mutual fund scheme since October 1999. The table below shows the purchase price Ajay paid for the units each month as well as the number of units Ajay purchased.Regular Date Investment Purchase Price per Unit No. of Units receivedOct 1999 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 10 500Nov 1999 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 9 556Dec 1999 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 9 556Jan 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 8 625Feb 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 7 714Mar 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 7 714Apr 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 6 833May 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 6 833June 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 6 833July 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 7 714Sept. 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 9 556Oct. 2000 Rs. 5,000 Rs. 10 500Total Rs. 65,000 8,648A brief glance at the table reveals the benefits of Rupee Cost Averaging. When the purchase price was high (eg. Rs 10 in Oct 1999), Ajay bought fewer units (500) and when the purchase price was low (eg. Rs 6 in Apr 2000), he bought significantly more (833).The average price Ajay paid for the units was Rs 7.52* (the total cost of the units - ie. Rs 65,000 divided by the total number of units purchased - ie. 8,648). This is less than the average market price over the period (Rs 7.77*) even though Ajay was not even trying to "time the market".In Oct. 2000, the value of Ajay's investment is approximately 33% higher than what it originally cost him (Original cost : Rs 65,000 Current value : Rs 10 x 8,648 units = Rs 86,480 ), even though the purchase price in Oct. 2000 was the same as it was in Oct. 1999 (ie. Rs 10).
This Article Has Been Published on Thu, 5 Aug 2010 and Read 146 Times